Yesterday, the kids and I walked over to our local elementary school to get the application to try and enroll the Politician in to kindergarten next year. The cut off is five by September 1st and his birthday is mid-September.
The deal is you fill out this application and then the reading specialist calls your kid in for a test before the end of the school year and then if they pass that test, there is another one before school starts in August. If the child passes both tests, they can be enrolled in kindergarten early. Before we left the lady we spoke to in the office said, "Just so you know, only about 3% of the kids that submit applications for Early Admission get accepted."
3%?!?! The whole elementary school has less then 500 kids. So that's about 80 kids per grade level and about 7 kids have a birthday per grade each month. With the window for Early Admissions at September 2nd to October 15th, about 10 kids in our school's area are eligible. Of those 10, say maybe half (that's probably high...) of them want to try to be admitted to kindergarten early. If my math is right, that means our elementary school admits one kid early every 6.5 years. On average.
Well, this made me stop and think for a bit. We brought the application home and there is a checklist of things to assess your child on, each with an ALWAYS, SOMETIMES, and NEVER category. There are few that the Politician does ALWAYS, a few more he does SOMETIMES and then quite a few we haven't even attempted. Counting in 5s and 10s?? Counting up to 31? With the right numbers?? And there are no periods at the ends of his sentences. Just lots and lots of Os.
With there being a few checks in the NEVER category, we're thinking the Politician isn't in the top 3% just yet. Early Admission is clearly in place for a significantly advanced child. I definitely think the Politician would enjoy and do well if he went to kindergarten this year, but why put him, and us, through the testing process unnecessarily. I think we will look for something a bit more structured, even if it is something a little different at home. Who knows, maybe we'll try for getting into 1st grade early instead, or maybe not.
There is a lot out there on how, and when, to start a more "formal" education. There was an article in the Washington post not to long ago about the Finnish education system. Their kids don't start school until they are seven years old. They also have a government funded childcare system, but kids aren't expected to sit in a classroom and be taught. Learning through young childhood is so much about exposure and less about rote memorization. Do we ask to much of our kids to soon? Do we set them up for failure by pushing to far? Or are we not challenging them enough and boring them into laziness? Way to many questions and finding the right balance is definitely not easy. And we will ALL make mistakes. (Yup, even me. I know hard to believe right, haha. I do happen to be right quite often, but I have a problem following my own advice sometimes.)
 |
The Enforcer is already starting to enjoy books and learning. At least he's not eating them here. |
While looking up some information on kindergarten homeschooling, I came across this comment on a post: "
My children’s education is an overall
plan, of which public schooling is only one component. So I don’t supplement their education, I am in charge of
it. Some pieces are outsourced to the public schools."
I love this. Really, it is exactly what I needed to hear. I have to say, I don't have a lot of faith in the direction of public schools today. So much of the emphasis is on getting good test scores, kids forget how to be creative, artistic, innovative and pure genius. On top of that, technology is moving much faster then the schools can keep up with. The world our children live in is smaller then ours. Everything is global. And sometimes seemingly instantaneous. The comment above really eased my fears a bit. Outsourcing some pieces of their education to the public schools doesn't seem so bad to me.